It is currently May 24th, 2018, 8:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2012, 2:01 pm 
Offline
GolfBizTalk Moderator

Joined: October 13th, 2009, 12:28 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: New England
1. Anyone watching?

2. Anyone give a sh!t? :lol:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2012, 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 19th, 2009, 8:52 am
Posts: 4054
Location: Central Valley, CA
Didn't somebody forget to file to get on the ballot? Maybe even two? I don't pay attention this early as by the time California has any kind of say in the matter, the actual people going for it are basically already figured out.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2012, 4:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 27th, 2009, 12:58 pm
Posts: 3664
Only to see how the media portrays Ron Paul.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2012, 10:40 pm 
Offline
GolfBizTalk Admin

Joined: October 12th, 2009, 9:48 am
Posts: 6072
mr_divots wrote:
Only to see how the media portrays Ron Paul.


Not 1/10th as well as he deserves. For some odd reason people who make sense in politics are usually met with scorn. Maybe it's because the press hates sense, it takes away their ability to ridicule.

My only interest in Iowa is constantly wondering why we let some of the dumbest people on earth act as national barometers.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 8:00 am 
Offline

Joined: October 17th, 2009, 9:28 am
Posts: 617
Today is the start of the process to pick the next presidential disappointment. The right candidate doesn't have a chance of getting elected (not sure who that is, but there's not a chance.)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: December 9th, 2009, 11:08 pm
Posts: 1704
The right candidate would not even run. And would finish last if he did.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: November 16th, 2009, 3:26 pm
Posts: 1283
RickB wrote:
mr_divots wrote:
Only to see how the media portrays Ron Paul.


Not 1/10th as well as he deserves. For some odd reason people who make sense in politics are usually met with scorn. Maybe it's because the press hates sense, it takes away their ability to ridicule.

My only interest in Iowa is constantly wondering why we let some of the dumbest people on earth act as national barometers.

Well said Rick. :beer:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: April 18th, 2010, 10:13 am
Posts: 1010
Location: Blaine, Missouri
I voted for him as a write-in in 1988 & 2008, &, if he doesn't "win" the Republican nomination, I'll still vote for him a third time as a write-in, regardless. Ron Paul 2012.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 27th, 2009, 12:58 pm
Posts: 3664
melviss666 wrote:
I voted for him as a write-in in 1988 & 2008, &, if he doesn't "win" the Republican nomination, I'll still vote for him a third time as a write-in, regardless. Ron Paul 2012.

Exactly! I don't give a sh#t if it's considered "wasting my vote," I AM writing in Ron Paul. He's the only guy with anything credible coming out of his mouth. To hell with this two party charade of "choice." :angry: :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 29th, 2009, 5:35 am
Posts: 780
Location: Iowa
RickB wrote:
My only interest in Iowa is constantly wondering why we let some of the dumbest people on earth act as national barometers.


My response to Rick:



Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 4:55 pm 
Offline
GolfBizTalk Admin

Joined: October 12th, 2009, 9:48 am
Posts: 6072
indacup wrote:
RickB wrote:
My only interest in Iowa is constantly wondering why we let some of the dumbest people on earth act as national barometers.


My response to Rick:



And my response is: So? WTH cares about gay marriage and women lawyers? Hell, even the people of Iowa don't give a damn about them, they are completely disregarded when it comes to voting for a candidate in Iowa. Do you deny that the people of Iowa are completely 100% for sale and are bought by whichever candidate sucks up most to them on ethanol subsidies, the most failed program in the long and dismal history of porkbarrel politics?

What a candidates says about foreign policy, human rights, national defense, jobs, legal reform or ANY OTHER ISSUE is meaningless in the Iowa caucuses, if he tells the truth about what a waste the ethanol boondoggle is he's torpedoed. Period.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 29th, 2009, 5:35 am
Posts: 780
Location: Iowa
Rick,
I am entering meeting. ...so you have about two hours to retract, revise and/or think your promulgations before I return and we get into it.

I can already tell you know that effective immediately, our sponsorship is over.

IfI am as stupid as you claim, then I guess you no longer need the support of those you feel are inferior to your high standards.

We WILL talk later.

RORY


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: April 18th, 2010, 10:13 am
Posts: 1010
Location: Blaine, Missouri
mr_divots wrote:
melviss666 wrote:
I voted for him as a write-in in 1988 & 2008, &, if he doesn't "win" the Republican nomination, I'll still vote for him a third time as a write-in, regardless. Ron Paul 2012.

Exactly! I don't give a sh#t if it's considered "wasting my vote," I AM writing in Ron Paul. He's the only guy with anything credible coming out of his mouth. To hell with this two party charade of "choice." :angry: :mrgreen:


The ones absolutely "wasting their votes" are the ones voting for another CFR, one-world, socialist, totalitarian clown. Anyone who thinks there's a difference between Obummer & Romney, Perry, Gingrich, Bachmann, or Santorum is utterly delusional. :beer:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 6:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 17th, 2009, 9:28 am
Posts: 617
indacup wrote:
Rick,
I am entering meeting. ...so you have about two hours to retract, revise and/or think your promulgations before I return and we get into it.

I can already tell you know that effective immediately, our sponsorship is over.

IfI am as stupid as you claim, then I guess you no longer need the support of those you feel are inferior to your high standards.

We WILL talk later.

RORY



Wow. That seems a bit over the top.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Iowa caucuses
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2012, 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 20th, 2011, 9:03 am
Posts: 106
Ron Paul is a nut ... with a few good ideas.

He's always been a nut ...


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO